Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 03705
Original file (BC 2012 03705.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
 

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

 AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03705 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

Her Reserve status from 30 Jul 08 to 31 Mar 12 be changed back 
to the Selected Reserve. 

 

By letters, dated 10 Oct 12 and 15 Oct 12, the applicant amended 
her request as follows: 

 

1. Her Reserve status from May 09 to 31 Mar 12 be changed back 
to Selected Reserve. 

 

2. Validate and make it a matter of record that her record was 
miscoded by ARPC through no fault of her own. 

 

3. The debt she owed to TRICARE be forgiven based on undue 
financial hardship and a coding error out of her control. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

She was erroneously coded as being a member of the Selected 
Reserve four years ago which made her eligible for the TRICARE 
Reserve Select program. During those years she utilized TRICARE 
and because of the Air Force error she will be held financially 
responsible for all TRICARE costs. 

 

Even though the coding error happened in 2008 she did not become 
aware of the error until 22 May 12. 

 

By letter, dated 10 Oct 12, the applicant indicated that she 
received a letter from the TRICARE Management Activity, noting 
that they are holding her family financially responsible for all 
healthcare costs due to an administrative error on part of the 
Air Force that allowed her TRICARE eligibility. In addition, 
she noted that the eligibility period was from May 09 to 
31 Mar 12 rather than 30 Jul 08 to 31 Mar 12. 

 

By letter, dated 15 Oct 12, the applicant further explained the 
circumstances surrounding the error and that she never 
misrepresented herself or her duties. Her duties as a member of 
the Participating Individual Ready Reserve (PIRR), requires her 


to have a Common Access Card (CAC) card, to log in for duty, 
training and other situations and has been the same since she 
left active duty. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

On 30 Jul 08, the applicant resigned her Regular Air Force 
commission. On 31 Jul 08, the applicant was appointed in the 
Reserve of the Air Force, in the grade of captain, with an 
assignment in the PIRR. The applicant was promoted to the grade 
of major with an effective date and date of rank of 2 Jun 10. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

ARPC/DPTT recommends TRICARE waive recoupment for the specified 
time frame, stating, in part, that these administrative errors 
were no fault of the applicant. 

 

The following is an analysis of the circumstances surrounding 
the case: 

 

a. The applicant's request to have her status changed to 
Selected Reserve is not warranted because she was appointed as a 
Category E Participating IRR member effective 31 Jul 08. 

 

b. On 10 Apr 09, the HQ ARPC/DEERS Project Office updated the 
applicant in the Defense Enrollment and Eligibility Reporting 
System (DEERS) Real-Time Automated Personnel Identification 
System (RAPIDS) Program Management RAPIDS as a Selective 
Reservist for the sole purpose of obtaining a CAC identification 
card. This update however, made her incorrectly eligible to 
enroll in TRICARE, which she did. On 14 May 09, the Defense 
Manpower Data Center (DMDC) changed her Reserve Category Code 
(RSVCC) back to IRR/Drill Status code "A" (identifying her as 
PIRR). The applicant then contacted DMDC on 29 Jun 09 
questioning why she was no longer eligible for Tricare Reserve 
Select. DMDC explained she was in the PIRR and referred her 
back to the ARPC/DEERS Project Office. On 2 Jul 09, the 
ARPC/DEERS Project Office changed her back to Selected Reserve, 
once again making her eligible for TRICARE. The applicant 
remained coded eligible for TRICARE until 9 Apr 12. 

 

c. On 10 Apr 12, DMDC changed her status back to IRR/Drill 
status code "A." On 24 Apr 12, DMDC requested verification of 
the applicant's status from the Air Force Reserve Liaison. On 
18 May 12, DMDC received confirmation that the applicant was in 


the PIRR, and not eligible for TRICARE. On 22 May 12, the 
applicant's record was incorrectly updated a third time to 
Selected Reserve status by the ARPC/DEERS Project Office, and 
then immediately changed back to the IRR. 

 

d. On 23 May 12, DMDC removed all invalid entries made by 
the HQ ARPC/DEERS Project Office. When questioned, HQ 
ARPC/DEERS Project Office personnel were not sure what source 
document caused the conflict. However, email traffic reveals 
assignment orders created incorrectly could have been a basis of 
the misunderstanding. 

 

The complete DPTT evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 26 Nov 12, for review and response. As of this 
date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C). 

 

Pursuant to the Board’s request, the applicant was contacted to 
provide a copy of the letter of indebtedness she received from 
the TRICARE Management Activity. 

 

The applicant’s complete response, with attachment, is at 
Exhibit D. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. After careful 
consideration of the applicant’s complete submission, we believe 
that partial relief is warranted. In this respect, we note the 
comments by the Air Force Reserve office of primary 
responsibility; however, the Board does not choose to adopt 
their recommended relief, which, given the complexity of the law 
in this area, would raise questions in other agencies about how 
to implement the Board’s intent. Instead, the Board recommends 
a more targeted method for relief of the TRICARE debt. Based on 
the evidence, it appears that ARPC erroneously updated the 
applicant’s status in DEERs to reflect that she was assigned as 
a Selected Reservist for the sole purpose of obtaining a CAC ID 
card. Consequently, this made the applicant incorrectly 
eligible to enroll in Tricare Reserve Select, in which she did. 
However, the applicant is now being held accountable for actions 


that were beyond her control. Therefore, we find it equitable 
that her record be corrected to reflect that she was assigned to 
the Selected Reserve for the limited purpose of determining 
eligibility for TRICARE Reserve Select during the period 14 May 
09 thru 31 Mar 12. Moreover, this recommended correction to her 
record is not intended to convey any other rights or privileges 
associated with Selected Reserve status. In view of the 
foregoing, and to preclude an injustice to the applicant, we 
recommend the applicant’s record be corrected to the extent 
indicated below. 

 

_______________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: 

 

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air 
Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that, for the 
limited purpose of determining TRICARE Reserve Select 
eligibility, she was assigned to the Selected Reserve from 
14 May 09 to 31 Mar 12. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-03705 in Executive Session on 18 and 19 Jun 13, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The 
following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 10 Aug 12, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Letter, ARPC/DPTT, undated, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 26 Nov 12. 

Exhibit D. Email, Applicant, dated 19 Jun 13. 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03705

    Original file (BC-2012-03705.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 2 Jul 09, the ARPC/DEERS Project Office changed her back to Selected Reserve, once again making her eligible for TRICARE. On 22 May 12, the applicant's record was incorrectly updated a third time to Selected Reserve status by the ARPC/DEERS Project Office, and then immediately changed back to the IRR. _______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02113

    Original file (BC-2011-02113.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She notes that even the Air Reserve Personnel Center (ARPC) Fact Sheet on the IRR does not disclose information about a Reserve officer’s promotion status and led her to believe that she would not be discharged unless she requested resignation of her commission. The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. The applicant was discharged from the Regular Air Force with a separation pay benefit prior to completing her MSO.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02287

    Original file (BC-2011-02287.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that on 25 Mar 04, she and the decedent had gone to a Air National Guard post to update their marital status in the Defense Eligibility Enrollment Reporting System (DEERS). We further note the applicant signed for the package sent to the now deceased former member notifying him of his eligibility to participate in the RCSBP. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006577

    Original file (20110006577.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    They tried to send him back $3,600 in premiums and informed him they would collect over $17,000 in medical bills that were paid out for the care of his family from July 2008 to December 2009. d. he called officials of the State of Wyoming, DEERS [Defense Enrollment Eligibility Reporting System], and Tricare to figure out what happened. He also provided email correspondence from a DEERS official who stated: * By law, Tricare uses DEERS to determine eligibility * His DEERS record showed he...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05474

    Original file (BC 2013 05474.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 21 Mar 11, his son was born and he turned in his son’s birth certificate for update in DEERS. Since he had not been married before and was still on Active Reserves, he was told there was nothing else needed and DEERS was updated. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that that the application will only be...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02001

    Original file (BC-2012-02001.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit B. Further, although the law currently provides automatic coverage for a spouse if the member fails to provide coverage or the spouse does not agree with the decision, no such provisions existed at the time of the member’s eligibility to enroll in the program. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00676

    Original file (BC 2014 00676.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00676 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her military service obligation be changed to no later than 18 Jul 2015 in regards to transferring Post-9/11 GI Bill education benefits. (3)(2), “For individuals eligible for retirement on or after Aug 1, 2011, 2 years of additional service required.” The DoDI clearly states the amount of service commitment that a...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00700

    Original file (BC-2011-00700.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00700 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her late husband’s records be corrected to reflect that he made an election for spouse coverage with immediate coverage based on full retired pay under the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003219

    Original file (20150003219.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect: * her husband is active duty and she is a commissioned officer in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) * both she and her husband took action to transfer education benefits to their children; however, she does not have a copy of the documentation she submitted * their daughter used education benefits transferred by her husband, as did their son (he is currently using those benefits) * she and her husband recognized her husband's benefits would be exhausted before...

  • CG | BCMR | Disability Cases | 2003-090

    Original file (2003-090.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Due to Applicant’s retirement on 01 July 2002, no entries currently exist in DEERS regarding his status during the relevant time period; therefore, there is nothing for the Coast Guard to correct.” APPLICANT’S RESPONSE TO THE VIEWS OF THE COAST GUARD The Judge Advocate General further stated that the “Coast Guard’s records support Applicant’s assertions regarding his status as a member of the SELRES during the period 01 February 02 to 30 June 2002. Applicant should be able to use his...